Litter Analysis

Litter Analysis — Mara-shima Genbu Go & Mara-Shimas Shining Miracle — BetterBred Litter Analysis – BetterBred.com
Litter Analysis Report
Mara-shima Genbu Go & Mara-Shimas Shining Miracle
Shiba Inu
Litter Summary →

Genetic Relationship Between This Pair

This Pairing
-0.038
Breed Avg
-0.002
·
Category 10
Genetic Equivalent
Unrelated for the Breed

Health tests are owner-reported. Verify directly with owners and request documentation before any breeding decision.

No health test data on file for these dogs.

The Outlier Index (OI) uses ratios of allele frequencies to measure a dog’s potential genetic contribution to the breed. A higher OI than breed average indicates a dog carries alleles that are underrepresented. Litter statistics are based on simulated puppies from this pairing.

Breed AvgMara-shima Genbu GoMara-Shimas Shining Miracle
Outlier Index0.360.220.30
Infrequent Alleles9511
Mid-Frequency Alleles1085
High-Frequency Alleles475350
Projected Litter Statistics
AverageMinimumMaximum
Outlier Index0.000.000.00
Infrequent Alleles000
Mid-Frequency Alleles000
High-Frequency Alleles000

Always compare to breed average. IR is most informative for highly inbred breeds. HL is more sensitive for diverse breeds or dogs with recent outcrosses. Two inbred dogs that are unrelated can produce very outbred offspring — and vice versa.

Breed AvgMara-shima Genbu GoMara-Shimas Shining Miracle
Internal Relatedness (IR)0.000.160.20
Homozygosity by Loci (HL)0.300.430.44
Percent Homozygosity33.1%45.5%48.5%
Projected Litter Statistics
AverageMinimumMaximum
Internal Relatedness (IR)0.000.000.00
Homozygosity by Loci (HL)0.000.000.00
Percent Homozygosity0.0%0.0%0.0%

Shows how genetically unusual or typical each dog is relative to its breed. “Admixed” ancestry indicates one parent was unusual and one was typical. Higher unusual ancestry than breed average means both parents carry genetics that are underrepresented in the breed.

Breed AvgMara-shima Genbu GoMara-Shimas Shining Miracle
Unusual Ancestry6.4%6.1%9.1%
Balanced Ancestry4.4%3.0%0.0%
Typical Ancestry69.7%87.9%72.7%
Admixed Ancestry19.6%3.0%18.2%
Projected Litter Statistics
AverageMinimumMaximum
Unusual Ancestry0.0%0.0%0.0%
Balanced Ancestry0.0%0.0%0.0%
Typical Ancestry0.0%0.0%0.0%
Admixed Ancestry0.0%0.0%0.0%

DLA haplotypes govern immune system function. Class I is assessed via DLA-88 and 4 STR markers. Class II covers DLA-DRB1, DLA-DQB1, and DLA-DQA1. Each puppy inherits one haplotype from each parent, giving four possible combinations at 25% probability each.

Mara-shima Genbu Go

1
1091 | 2067
2
1191 | 2018

Class I / Class II

Mara-Shimas Shining Miracle

1
1054 | 2106
2
1054 | 2106

Class I / Class II

Puppy Haplotype Combinations — 25% Probability Each
Combination 1
25% per puppy
S
1091|2067
D
1054|2106
Combination 2
25% per puppy
S
1091|2067
D
1054|2106
Combination 3
25% per puppy
S
1191|2018
D
1054|2106
Combination 4
25% per puppy
S
1191|2018
D
1054|2106

Per-locus allele values and frequency classification. Green = infrequent allele (rare — good for diversity). Red = high-frequency allele (very common in the breed). Homozygosity probability reflects the chance offspring of this pairing will be identical at each locus.

Locus Sire ASire BFreq AFreq B Dam ADam BFreq AFreq B Sire ASire BDam ADam B Hom.
1 100 102 0.2590 0.2260 102 104 0.2260 0.4400 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 25%
2 151 151 0.1180 0.1180 153 153 0.2190 0.2190 Avg Avg Hfrq Hfrq 0%
3 121 121 0.8340 0.8340 121 121 0.8340 0.8340 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 100%
4 219 227 0.8240 0.1380 219 219 0.8240 0.8240 Hfrq Infr Hfrq Hfrq 50%
5 244 244 0.5630 0.5630 244 244 0.5630 0.5630 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 100%
6 87 89 0.2590 0.1810 91 91 0.3640 0.3640 Hfrq Infr Hfrq Hfrq 0%
7 282 288 0.1380 0.2840 290 290 0.2910 0.2910 Infr Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 0%
8 120 130 0.2160 0.1180 124 132 0.3290 0.1260 Hfrq Infr Hfrq Avg 0%
9 144 154 0.3770 0.2690 132 144 0.1060 0.3770 Hfrq Hfrq Infr Hfrq 25%
10 160 160 0.4570 0.4570 160 160 0.4570 0.4570 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 100%
11 232 232 0.0350 0.0350 242 242 0.5930 0.5930 Infr Infr Hfrq Hfrq 0%
12 97 97 0.7910 0.7910 97 97 0.7910 0.7910 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 100%
13 106 124 0.2840 0.4520 124 126 0.4520 0.0580 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Infr 25%
14 150 150 0.4350 0.4350 150 150 0.4350 0.4350 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 100%
15 210 212 0.4100 0.2790 212 216 0.2790 0.1330 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Infr 25%
16 95 95 0.4750 0.4750 97 97 0.1410 0.1410 Hfrq Hfrq Infr Infr 0%
17 227 235 0.0930 0.0650 227 227 0.0930 0.0930 Infr Infr Infr Infr 50%
18 206 206 0.4600 0.4600 210 210 0.3540 0.3540 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 0%
19 216 216 0.2810 0.2810 212 218 0.2040 0.1210 Hfrq Hfrq Avg Infr 0%
20 164 168 0.4850 0.2140 162 164 0.0280 0.4850 Hfrq Hfrq Infr Hfrq 25%
21 268 270 0.2310 0.5450 270 272 0.5450 0.1260 Avg Hfrq Hfrq Infr 25%
22 228 238 0.1660 0.2040 226 240 0.0100 0.2440 Hfrq Hfrq Infr Hfrq 0%
23 145 149 0.1610 0.3590 145 149 0.1610 0.3590 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 50%
24 13 13 0.5700 0.5700 13 14 0.5700 0.1760 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 50%
25 16.1 18.1 0.2760 0.1780 18.1 19.1 0.1780 0.4550 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 25%
26 14 16 0.7340 0.0250 14 18 0.7340 0.0830 Hfrq Infr Hfrq Infr 25%
27 31 31 0.4670 0.4670 31 31 0.4670 0.4670 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 100%
28 21 22 0.2940 0.1010 15 19 0.2960 0.1480 Hfrq Avg Hfrq Hfrq 0%
29 13 13 0.5950 0.5950 13 13 0.5950 0.5950 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 100%
30 18 18 0.2290 0.2290 16 16 0.3570 0.3570 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 0%
31 14 19.3 0.1980 0.3640 15 19.3 0.0280 0.3640 Hfrq Hfrq Infr Hfrq 25%
32 18 18 0.3820 0.3820 14 18 0.2090 0.3820 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq 50%
33 12 13 0.2410 0.2990 12 16 0.2410 0.0130 Hfrq Hfrq Hfrq Infr 25%