Profile

AKC GCH CH Expecting to Fly of Ojibway — BetterBred Profile – BetterBred.com

1 / 3

AKC GCH CH Expecting to Fly of Ojibway

Italian Greyhound · M · b. 2019

0.26OI

-0.01AGR

0.00IR

0.27Breed avg OI

Compare this dog to:

Type 3+ letters · select from dropdown

Breed Context

Outlier Index (OI) 0.26 Breed avg: 0.27

Lower contributionHigher contribution

This dog carries an allele profile close to the breed average — neither notably typical nor unusual. Breed it based on health, structure, temperament, and try to find a mate with an equal or somewhat higher OI and as unrelated as possible. If you choose to breed it, pick offspring of equal quality and OI equal to or higher than both parents.

Internal Relatedness (IR) 0.00 Breed avg: 0.04

More outbredMore inbred

The amount of the same DNA inherited from each parent within this dog's own genome is close to the breed norm. Neither a concern nor a standout result. In breeds where the population average IR is already low, an average score here is a solid result. Focus on OI and complementary breed type quality in a mate.

How the breed is moving — older dogs vs. recent dogs

Outlier Index (OI)

0.26

↓ 0.02

Breed avg: 0.27

Before 2018: 0.28 Since 2024: 0.26

Avg Genetic Rel (AGR)

-0.01

↑ 0.03

Breed avg: 0.00

Before 2018: -0.01 Since 2024: 0.02

Internal Relatedness (IR)

0.00

↑ 0.02

Breed avg: 0.04

Before 2018: 0.03 Since 2024: 0.05

Gold dot = this dog · Gold line = current breed avg · Sage line = avg since 2024 · Gray line = avg before 2018 · For OI: higher is better. For AGR and IR: lower is better.

DLA Haplotypes — Class I | Class II · frequency in breed database

1040|2039

8.5% / 8.5%

1044|2034

21.2% / 21.2%

Find potential mates for this dog, ranked by OI — the recommended primary metric for preserving allelic diversity. Also ranked by AGR and Genetic Relatedness. Available on your dashboard.

View Potential Mates →

OI and IR are genetic diversity metrics intended to inform breeding decisions at the population level. They do not diagnose disease, predict individual health outcomes, or substitute for breed-required health testing or veterinary guidance. Conformation, temperament, longevity, and health history all belong in this decision.

Amos, W. et al. (2001). The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 268, 2021–2027. [IR formula] · Wang, J. (2002). An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics, 160, 1203–1215. [GR formula] · Pedersen, N.C. et al. (2015). The effect of genetic bottlenecks and inbreeding on the incidence of two major autoimmune diseases in standard poodles. Canine Genetics and Epidemiology, 2, 14.

Breed	Italian Greyhound
Gender	M
Call Name	Greg
Date of Birth	2019-04-25
Registration #	TS42977205
State	Michigan
Country	US
Sire	GCHB CH Cantex Blue Jay's Topdog
Dam	GCHG CH Ferazi GDM Titania at Jaros

friendly

Registered Color	Blue-Fawn
Markings	White Markings
Height	16
Weight	14 lbs

Color Panel

B Locus B/B

D Locus d/d

E Locus Em/Em

A Locus AY/AY

S Locus S/S

Create a free account to contact this dog's owner.

Already have an account? Log in

Parents

SireGCHB CH Cantex Blue Jay's Topdog

DamGCHG CH Ferazi GDM Titania at Jaros

Breed Population

See how this dog's numbers sit within the full Italian Greyhound population and track breed diversity over time.

View Breed Profile →

The two moments breeders have influence on their breed's future are when choosing a mate, and choosing a keeper puppy. Both deserve full genetic information.