Profile

F'Taiga Enso Kensha — BetterBred Profile – BetterBred.com

Breeds Akita - Japanese Profile

F'Taiga Enso Kensha

Akita - Japanese  · F  · b. 2020

0.20OI
0.02IR
0.03AGR
0.24Breed avg OI
Compare this dog to:
Type 3+ letters · select from dropdown
Breed Context
Outlier Index (OI) 0.20 Breed avg: 0.24
Lower contributionHigher contribution

This dog's allele profile skews toward the more classic end of the breed's frequency distribution. Its genetics are reasonably well-represented in the population. It can contribute to a breeding program, but pairing it with a higher-OI mate that is also as unrelated as possible would be a sensible way to strengthen the diversity of the resulting litter, thereby contributing to your program and the breed. As with all dogs carrying predominantly classic genetics, the breed's accumulated health history is one more reason to confirm good health before breeding. It is not a priority for retention on diversity grounds alone, but if it is a good example of the breed and remains healthy, it can produce puppies that improve on its contribution when selected for higher OI, as well as being of equal or better quality in terms of breed type and function. If you choose to breed it, pick offspring of equal quality and higher OI.

Internal Relatedness (IR) 0.02 Breed avg: 0.01
More outbredMore inbred

The amount of the same DNA inherited from each parent within this dog's own genome is close to the breed norm. Neither a concern nor a standout result. In breeds where the population average IR is already low, an average score here is a solid result. Focus on OI and complementary breed type quality in a mate.

Outlier Index (OI)

0.20
↑ 0.05
Breed avg: 0.24
Before 2018: 0.23 Since 2024: 0.28

Avg Genetic Rel (AGR)

0.03
↓ 0.07
Breed avg: -0.02
Before 2018: 0.00 Since 2024: -0.08

Internal Relatedness (IR)

0.02
↑ 0.14
Breed avg: 0.01
Before 2018: 0.01 Since 2024: 0.15

Gold dot = this dog · Gold line = current breed avg · Sage line = avg since 2024 · Gray line = avg before 2018 · For OI: higher is better. For AGR and IR: lower is better.

DLA Haplotypes — Class I | Class II · frequency in breed database

1
1083|2039
10.3% / 10.7%
2
1092|2035
27.7% / 27.7%

Find potential mates for this dog, ranked by OI — the recommended primary metric for preserving allelic diversity. Also ranked by AGR and Genetic Relatedness. Available on your dashboard.

View Potential Mates →

OI and IR are genetic diversity metrics intended to inform breeding decisions at the population level. They do not diagnose disease, predict individual health outcomes, or substitute for breed-required health testing or veterinary guidance. Conformation, temperament, longevity, and health history all belong in this decision.

Amos, W. et al. (2001). The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 268, 2021–2027. [IR formula]  ·  Wang, J. (2002). An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics, 160, 1203–1215. [GR formula]  ·  Pedersen, N.C. et al. (2015). The effect of genetic bottlenecks and inbreeding on the incidence of two major autoimmune diseases in standard poodles. Canine Genetics and Epidemiology, 2, 14.

BreedAkita - Japanese
GenderF
Date of Birth2020-12-02
CountryLV
SireM'Kairou Go Des Tamplier Sacres
DamIzumi Gai Fubuki shimi
Health Certificate

No temperament description has been recorded for this dog.

Registered Colorred

Create a free account to contact this dog's owner.

Register Free

Already have an account? Log in

Breed Population

See how this dog's numbers sit within the full Akita - Japanese population and track breed diversity over time.

View Breed Profile →

The two moments breeders have influence on their breed's future are when choosing a mate, and choosing a keeper puppy. Both deserve full genetic information.